Archive | Broadcast RSS feed for this section

Controversy Makes Whopper Virgins A Success For Burger King

Whopper Virgins

For years, the taste test has been a staple of many food advertisers’ arsenal. It’s simple to do, it’s easy to explain, and most of the time the message comes across loud and clear.

Now though, Burger King has decided to follow their lost wallet and Burger King Studio campaigns by giving the taste test a twist, and is documenting the process with a campaign that they’re calling Whopper Virgins, which aims to put the Whopper to “the ultimate taste test without the benefit of brand recognition or marketing support of any kind.” (And specifically, “No kings or clowns.”)

The problem is obvious: When most people see a taste test, they assume that it’s biased; so how do you convince your audience that you’ve managed to assemble the only group of people in the world that have never eaten a burger before into an unbiased group of testers when almost everyone has at least tried a burger or two during the course of their life?

The answer seems even more obvious: Find people that have never before eaten a burger. However, this leads to additional problems, because now you have to find a way to prove that they’ve never eaten a burger. Enter: Whopper Virgins.

The idea is simple: Take people that have never before experienced a burger, prove that they’ve never before experienced a burger with the fact that their language doesn’t even contain a word for burger, and then give them your burger and your competitor’s burger to see which one they like more. Film the whole process (including the always important making of footage), stitch together a convincing story line, and call it a day.

The execution however is critical: You must be convincing enough to show that you actually ran an unbiased taste test, but one-sided enough to show that your brand was the clear winner. It needs to be equal parts documentary and mocumentary, and the taste test must be both entertaining and informational. According to Russ Klein, president of global marketing, strategy and innovation at Burger King,

“During a time when consumers are craving it most, honesty and transparency are the heart and soul of this campaign. By embarking on a voyage of this magnitude that held no guarantees and left us open to vulnerabilities, we took a leap of faith that our signature product would win people over at first bite.”

For the Whopper Virgin documentary, Burger King has only just teased what the campaign will be all about, with cliff-hanger TV commercials that lead to a microsite which features a slideshow and a countdown timer to the documentary’s world premiere, but even with just the few stills and short clips that are currently available, controversy around the ad is already starting to build.

Detractors include Duncan Riley from The Inquisitr who said “It doesn’t get much more offensive than this.” and Sharon Akabas from the Institute of Human Nutrition at Columbia University who said, “It’s outrageous. What’s next? Are we going to start taking guns out to some of these remote places and ask them which one they like better?”

However, according to Brian Gies, vice president of marketing impact at Burger King,

“The people we encountered along the way were wonderful. They were enthusiastic about sampling our product and even more eager to share their culture, including their own food, with the team conducting the tests.”

Depending on how Burger King plays their cards though, this controversy could be what makes this campaign a success, as all eyes will be trained on the website once the countdown timer reaches zero.

Taste Test Timer

In addition, Burger King has already started the process of answering to the criticism with a statement in their press release that said:

At the conclusion of each taste test, Burger King Corp. worked cooperatively with local authorities to make donations, tailored specifically to benefit each individual community that participated in the ‘study’ and make a lasting contribution in each region. The company donated educational supplies and children’s toys in Thailand and Greenland that will benefit local schools and increase learning opportunities for children. In Romania, the company helped fund a restoration of a 17th century church, which will enhance one of the community’s central gathering places.

So besides controversy then, how else does Burger King plan to win with this ad?


Simple: Make Whopper Virgins unavoidable by making it seem like the biggest blockbuster that’s ever been produced. Hire skateboard legend Stacy Peralta to direct it, use 13 Planes, 2 Dog Sleds and 1 Helicopter to help make it all possible, find stereotypes from all around the world will take part in it, and use footage shot in some of the world’s most remote places to bring it all together and make it all happen. Plus, considering the support that this documentary has received so far, it might as well have made its debut on the big screen!

Will it work?

We’ll just have to wait and see, but if you believe that there is no such thing as bad publicity, then the sheer number of times that Whopper Virgins has already been mentioned in the press recently before even launching the official documentary (though much of it negative) is reason enough to call this campaign a success.

The Good:

  • Controversy leads to tons of press coverage.
  • Unique spin on the taste test gives an old format new life.
  • Campaign spans multiple channels, drawing viewers in from all around.
  • Countdown builds hype and gives the campaign an official release.

The Bad:

  • Controversy means much of the press coverage is negative.
  • Hype must be lived up to.

The Future:

  • Longer format commercials become documentaries about the brand, and old concepts are revisited with new spins.

Whopper Virgins

The Making Of A Commercial Becomes A Commercial

Toshiba Upscaling

Toshiba’s upscaling technology takes standard definition content and transforms it into near high definition quality.

The ides is that upscaling will “take anything you watch and make it astonishing”, so Toshiba needed to create an ad that would explain that concept in less than a minute. In short, they too needed something astonishing.

What they came up with was the concept of a “Timesculpture” where, through a combination of time shifting, clever camera work and post production magic, a ballet of movement is created that looks like the world through the eyes of a DJ:

The ad is beautiful, imaginative, unexpected and engaging, and goes beyond advertising and into the world of art.

Why would a company create art when it’s trying to sell you technology?

Because beautiful, imaginative, unexpected and engaging art tells a story that you want to revisit; it creates questions that you want to answer; and it draws you back in for more. Art can be appreciated independently of the message, and the ‘making of’ can become an ad in its own right:

Sure, it takes 2.9 million individual renamed frames, 20,000 gigabytes of material, 200 cameras and countless hours of editing, but when millions of people actively seek out your commercials to find out more about them, you’ve reached your audience on an entirely new level, and can call your campaign a definite success.

The Good:

  • Timesculpture is so unique that it needs a ‘making of’ to explain the process.
  • Audience seeks out the additional content.
  • Subtle nuances mean the ad doesn’t quickly grow stale.

The Bad:

  • High production costs.
  • The ‘making of’ tactic only works if the audience really likes the ad.

The Future:

  • Commercials become art, and the story behind the commercial becomes the commercial.

Toshiba – Upscaling