<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sharpie Gets Uncapped And Embraces The Social Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefutureofads.com/sharpie-gets-uncapped-and-embraces-the-social-web/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefutureofads.com/sharpie-gets-uncapped-and-embraces-the-social-web</link>
	<description>The Future of Advertising</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:39:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tpldrew</title>
		<link>http://thefutureofads.com/sharpie-gets-uncapped-and-embraces-the-social-web/comment-page-1#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>tpldrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 16:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefutureofads.com/?p=495#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my question. Is there a need for the &#039;sharpie&#039; portal? Couldn&#039;t Sharpie just participate at Flickr and YouTube? It would have cost less and may have been even MORE successful. Just a question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#39;s my question. Is there a need for the &#39;sharpie&#39; portal? Couldn&#39;t Sharpie just participate at Flickr and YouTube? It would have cost less and may have been even MORE successful. Just a question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
